The Capital Market Regulator, SEBI, in its Board Meeting held on December 28, 2021 has inter-alia, approved the revised framework for preferential issues. These changes have been brought in line with the suggestions and recommendations received from the market/ industry participants on its Consultation Paper Dated November 26, 2021.
SEBI, on one hand has relaxed the lock in provisions and at the same time has plugged in the loopholes revolving around the pricing norms therein.
A comparative of the Changes so approved by SEBI in Chapter V of SEBI (ICDR) Regulations, 2018 have been enumerated below. These shall become effective from the date of their Notification in the Official Gazzette.
Determination of Minimum Issue Price: For Frequently Traded Shares: Reg 164 (1)
CASE 1: When No Change in control/ allotment of < 5% of post issue fully diluted share capital
NEW LAW |
Higher of: |
i. 90/10 trading days’ volume weighted average price (VWAP) of the scrip preceding the relevant date, whichever is higher, or |
ii. any stricter provision in the Article of Association (AOA) of the issuer company |
EXISTING LAW |
Higher of: |
26/2 weeks’ volume weighted average price (VWAP) of average of weekly high and low of the scrip preceding the Relevant Date. |
CP REMARKS:
|
CASE 2: When there is Change in control/ allotment of > 5% of post issue fully diluted share capital, to an allottee either individually or acting in concert
NEW LAW |
Higher of: |
i. 90/10 trading days’ volume weighted average price (VWAP) of the scrip preceding the relevant date, whichever is higher or |
ii. any stricter provision in the Article of Association (AOA) of the issuer company |
iii. Valuation Report from a registered Independent Valuer |
EXISTING LAW |
Higher of: |
26/2 weeks’ volume weighted average price (VWAP) of average of weekly high and low of the scrip preceding the relevant date |
CP REMARKS:
|
CASE III: In case of Infrequently traded shares
New Law as well as existing law: The provisions remain unchanged, Valuation Report from an Independent Valuer is needed to be obtained.
III. Meeting of Independent Directors:
NEW LAW |
|
OLD LAW |
Committee of Independent Directors and meeting thereof was not required. |
CP REMARKS:
|
III. Lock-in on Shares allotted on Preferential basis:
|
New Law |
Existing Law |
CP Remarks |
For Promoters |
Upto 20% of the post issue paid up capital: For 18 months Above 20% of the post issue paid up capital: For 6 months |
Upto 20% of the post issue paid up capital: For 3 years Above 20% of the post issue paid up capital: For 1 year |
Lock-in periods are reasonably reduced in line with lock-in requirements in case of IPOs. This may encourage more Strategic Investors in the preferential issues. As generally, the promoters don’t offload their shares, so this provision may not have much of an impact on them. |
For Non-Promoters |
For a period of 6 months |
The existing lock in period is 1 year. |
IV. Pledge of locked-in shares held by Promoters
New Law |
Existing Law |
Remarks |
|
ICDR was silent |
Practically, as a part of rules and procedures of Depositories, the lock-in shares can be pledged with banks/ financial institutions by the Promoters, with the condition that they shall remain under lock-in. Now, the same has been specifically incorporated in ICDR with end use restriction on the loan so obtained by the Issuer Company. |
V. Consideration other than cash: Reg 163(3)
New Law |
Old Law |
Remarks |
|
|
In order to curb the undue benefits to be availed by the preferential allottees.
|
VI. Timeline for seeking In-Principle Approval: (Reg 28 of SEBI Listing Regulations, 2015)
New Law |
Old Law |
CP Remarks |
In-Principle Application to stock exchanges to be filed on the same day as the date of dispatch of notice for AGM/ EGM to shareholders |
No specific timeframe. Company to seek In-Principle approval anytime before making allotment of securities. |
Practically, this may be little challenging for the Companies, because in most of the cases, by the time the Shareholders’ Notices are dispatched, the lock in incorporations are not in place. The Companies may have to be pro-active in arranging all the certificates as mentioned in the formats for seeking In-principle approval. |
To conclude, although from the Regulator’s perspective, the changes in the pricing norms were the need of the hour, but the Preferential Issues may lose their sheen, in view of the process simplicity that was there. In a Preferential Issue, any Strategic Investor comes with a limited time horizon of 2-3 years and then taking an exit, but the requisite of the pricing to be computed by a Registered Valuer, may make them disinterested in the issue. This would hold true, in both the situations, if the Valuer’s price is more than the running MP, the Investor may not be keen in investing, since it may not be in a position to garner the expected Exit Value and inversely, if the Valuer’s Price is less than the running MP, then also the Investors may decline since the intrinsic value of the scrip, in that case would be coming lower. Having said that, these amendments have been triggered by the practices that were prevalent in the market and to avoid the market abuse.